A comment from my last post:
i read that too, but i found it mildly amusing cause just like most stereotypes, it's based on at least some truth. if it wasn't a bit true, then how would the generalization have come about in the first place? also, generalizations always come with exceptions, so you've made a moo point. saying socal drivers are shitty is like saying asians are frugal and have small eyes; it's true in many cases, but not in all. and an example of how it's possible for norcal and socal to have apparent differences: hella.
and about us only living in san diego. this is true, but we've also driven thru l.a. and orange county to get home and back many times. i think that qualifies us to make generalizations about socal drivers based on our experiences. after all, socal mainly consists of the l.a., orange, and sd counties no?
First of all, while it may be true that stereotypes come from some truth, a generalization is not at all required to come from truth. A generalization is just someone making inferences about something they know and applying it to something they do not know. And of course, if they do not know anything about it, then how can that be based on truth?
Secondly, the whole point of my entry was that the whole Norcal vs. Socal thing is a generalization, and that is a bad thing, especially when it pertains to something negative. Saying that Socal drivers are shitty is only somewhat true because most drivers are shitty. Shitty drivers are not just limited to Socal. Plus, stereotypes like these are only propagated further because people only remember what they want to. If you knew nothing about Socal drivers, and someone told you Socal drivers were shitty drivers, then you would obviously expect Socal drivers to be shitty. And therefore, any shitty drivers you see would stick out in your mind, further cementing that stereotype in your mind. Expectations are very hard to overcome.
Also, while it is true that you have driven through L.A., Orange, AND San Diego counties, that is probably pretty much the extent of your experience. And to say that is a little misleading, because in actuality, the only thing you are doing is driving on the Interstate 5 through L.A., Orange, and San Diego counties. That's not saying much. If the extent of your knowledge really is only driving through Socal, then by no means are you qualified to make a generalization. Once again, you would be applying knowledge about something you do know to something that you do not know. You cannot be qualified to do something that you know nothing about, and if you think you can be qualified, then you are never going to get a job.
i read that too, but i found it mildly amusing cause just like most stereotypes, it's based on at least some truth. if it wasn't a bit true, then how would the generalization have come about in the first place? also, generalizations always come with exceptions, so you've made a moo point. saying socal drivers are shitty is like saying asians are frugal and have small eyes; it's true in many cases, but not in all. and an example of how it's possible for norcal and socal to have apparent differences: hella.
and about us only living in san diego. this is true, but we've also driven thru l.a. and orange county to get home and back many times. i think that qualifies us to make generalizations about socal drivers based on our experiences. after all, socal mainly consists of the l.a., orange, and sd counties no?
First of all, while it may be true that stereotypes come from some truth, a generalization is not at all required to come from truth. A generalization is just someone making inferences about something they know and applying it to something they do not know. And of course, if they do not know anything about it, then how can that be based on truth?
Secondly, the whole point of my entry was that the whole Norcal vs. Socal thing is a generalization, and that is a bad thing, especially when it pertains to something negative. Saying that Socal drivers are shitty is only somewhat true because most drivers are shitty. Shitty drivers are not just limited to Socal. Plus, stereotypes like these are only propagated further because people only remember what they want to. If you knew nothing about Socal drivers, and someone told you Socal drivers were shitty drivers, then you would obviously expect Socal drivers to be shitty. And therefore, any shitty drivers you see would stick out in your mind, further cementing that stereotype in your mind. Expectations are very hard to overcome.
Also, while it is true that you have driven through L.A., Orange, AND San Diego counties, that is probably pretty much the extent of your experience. And to say that is a little misleading, because in actuality, the only thing you are doing is driving on the Interstate 5 through L.A., Orange, and San Diego counties. That's not saying much. If the extent of your knowledge really is only driving through Socal, then by no means are you qualified to make a generalization. Once again, you would be applying knowledge about something you do know to something that you do not know. You cannot be qualified to do something that you know nothing about, and if you think you can be qualified, then you are never going to get a job.